Are we becoming a society of narcissists? And if so, what
are the implications of excessive self-esteem for organizational
leadership and management?
Decades of effort to improve our collective self-esteem (kicked off by Nathaniel Branden’s The Psychology of Self-Esteem in 1969) have undoubtedly had positive effects, but there have also been some unintended consequences. It appears that one such result is the steady rise in narcissism among college students over the past 25 years, as noted by Associated Press writer David Crary:
Today’s college students are more narcissistic
and self-centered than their predecessors, according to a comprehensive
new study by five psychologists who worry that the trend could be
harmful to personal relationships and American society."We need to stop endlessly repeating ‘You’re special’ and having children repeat that back," said the study’s lead author, Professor Jean Twenge of San Diego State University. "Kids are self-centered enough already."
Twenge and her colleagues…examined the responses of 16,475 college students nationwide who completed an evaluation called the Narcissistic Personality Inventory [NPI] between 1982 and 2006…
The researchers describe their study as the largest ever of its type and say students’ NPI scores have risen steadily since the current test was introduced in 1982. By 2006, they said, two-thirds of
the students had above-average scores, 30 percent more than in 1982.
David Bradford’s class on High Performance Leadership at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business, uses Michael Maccoby’s Harvard Business Review article on Narcissistic Leaders as a central reading. Maccoby explores the pros and cons of narcissism in the organizational context:
[Productive narcissists] are gifted and creative strategists who see the big picture and find meaning in the risky proposition of changing the world and leaving behind a legacy. Indeed, one reason we look to productive narcissists in times of great transition is that they have the audacity to push
through the massive transformations that society periodically undertakes. Productive narcissists are not only risk takers willing to get the job done but also charmers who can convert the masses with their rhetoric. The danger is that narcissism can turn unproductive when, lacking self-knowledge and restraining anchors, narcissists become unrealistic dreamers. They nurture grand schemes and harbor the illusion that only circumstances or enemies block their success. This tendency toward grandiosity and distrust is the Achilles’ heel of narcissism. Because of it, even brilliant narcissists can come under
suspicion for self–involvement, unpredictability and—in extreme cases—paranoia.
(It may be useful to note that Maccoby is discussing "normal" rather than "pathological" narcissism. In this context, narcissists are simply one of the three primary personality types identified by Freud–the other two being obsessives, who are focused on order and conscientiousness, and erotics, who are focused on relationships and loving and being loved by others. As Maccoby notes, "Most of us have elements of all three [types.] We are all, for example,
somewhat narcissistic. If that were not so, we would not be able to
survive or assert our needs. The point is, one of the dynamic
tendencies usually dominates the others, making each of us react
differently to success and failure." My assumption is that Twenge’s research uses the term in a similar sense.)
What conclusions might we begin to draw if we look at Maccoby’s analysis in light of Twenge’s research?
- Narcissists will become an increasingly prevalent personality type in organizations.
- This means more "risk takers willing to get the job done" and more "charmers who can convert the masses."
- But it also means more "unrealistic dreamers" with tendencies "toward grandiosity and distrust."
So how do we make the most of narcissists’ productive capabilities while minimizing the baggage they bring with them? Maccoby’s comment that narcissists turn unproductive when they lack "self-knowledge and restraining anchors" points to leadership development and management training programs that will allow narcissists to better understand themselves (and how their strengths can also be weaknesses) while making them more aware of their impact on others.
Executive coaching, T-groups, and other training services that provide people with specific, actionable feedback strike me as some of the most effective ways to insure that narcissists fulfill their productive potential while avoiding the pitfalls of their personality type.
3 Responses
Good stuff, Ed. And, thanks.
The manatra that this and your last post point to, for me, is Socrates’ “know thyself”. Like it or not, believe it or not, the fact is that everyone brings their “biography and biology” (read: their family) to work.
The reason groups are used in process work is because they remind us of our families…mentally, physically, emotionally, psychologically, verbally, non-verbally, etc., and we react in kind…even at work (albeit unconsciously for most).
The individual who is personally self-aware and “conscious” is usually more apt to create honest and healthy relationships at work, be less reactive, and engage in fewer self-sabotgaging and self-destructive behaviors, e.g., bullying, gossiping, control-freakish behaviors, etc., and often is able to shy away from destructive ego-driven and obsessive needs for control, recognition and security.
Labeleing this type of self-awareness process work “soft”, airy-fairy”, “new agey”, etc., is a resistant/reactive response usually based on an underlying fear of getting to know one’s self.
Narcississm plays out in self-destructive behaviors due to one’s experiencing one’s self as “deficient” in some way (usually unconscious) or from one’s needing to come from a place of “grandiosity” (also, usually unconscous.
For the healthy narcissist who comes from a place of self-awareness, ambitions and ideals are self-supportive and lead to healthy self-actualization and healthy relationships. For the unhealthy narcissist, generally, ambitions and ideals lead to self-destruction in some way, shape or form.
Poor you — married to an obsessive narcissist who refuses to reform!
Thanks, Peter–very thought-provoking, and I particularly like your emphasis on the importance of our family histories (and thus the necessity of understanding how our family dynamics play out in our work relationships.)
And Amy, why do you think I became a coach? 😉
Ed